“When blood flows, it flows in buckets”

Summary Stephen King praises In a violent nature for its leisurely pace and abundant blood flow. Critics applaud the independent slasher film for its unique perspective and excessive gore. In a violent nature garners controversial reviews from audiences but performs well at the box office. SCREEN VIDEO OF THE DAY SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT […]

“When blood flows, it flows in buckets”

Summary

  • Stephen King praises
    In a violent nature
    for its leisurely pace and abundant blood flow.
  • Critics applaud the independent slasher film for its unique perspective and excessive gore.
  • In a violent nature
    garners controversial reviews from audiences but performs well at the box office.



SCREEN VIDEO OF THE DAY

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Stephen King raves about In a violent nature, a new slasher film with a Rotten Tomatoes score of 86%. Written and directed by Chris Nash, the Canadian slasher film follows a mute murderer who preys on a group of teenagers in the Ontario wilderness, with most of the events taking place from the killer’s point of view. The film‘s cast is made up entirely of unknown actors, including Ry Barrett, Andrea Pavlovic, Cameron Love, Reece Presley, Liam Leone, Charlotte Creaghan, Lea Rose, Sam Roulston, Alexander Oliver, Lauren-Marie Taylor and Timothy Paul McCarthy.


On X, formerly Twitter, Stephen King delighted In a violent naturethe caller”quietly, almost languorously, but when the blood flows, it flows in torrents“. King also referred to the film‘s masked killer as “the most terrifying Minion in the world. » Discover his full article below:

King’s full message reads: “IN A VIOLENT NATURE: If you need a slasher film, this one will do the trick. It’s calm, almost languorous, but when the blood flows, it flows in torrents. The killer in his mask looks like the most terrifying Minion in the world“.

Related

In a violent nature ending explained

The ending of In A Violent Nature leaves the door open for potential sequels and reflects on how brutal impulses can create surprising monsters.



What do critics and audiences say in a violent context?

In a violent nature, due to its unique perspective and excessive amount of blood, garnered a lot of attention for an independent horror film. It premiered at Sundance in January 2024 as part of the festival’s “Midnight” programming, reserved for highlighting more experimental titles. After its premiere at Sundance, In a violent nature critics praised the film for its intense focus on its hellish creature, providing a delicious grotesque banquet for gore lovers. With these positive reviews, the horror film holds an 86% score on Rotten Tomatoes from critics.


The film‘s 44% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes is a different story, indicating that In a violent nature divided viewers. However, it’s not very surprising that a film that features a gratuitous amount of gore and focuses on the killer’s point of view would elicit divisive reactions among audiences. Commentators have also drawn comparisons between In a violent nature and the “slow cinema” genre, with Nash taking inspiration from Gus Van Sant and Terrence Malick, which could be another reason why the horror film divided audiences.

Despite controversial public reactions, In a violent nature performed well at the box office for a low-budget horror film. After premiering at Sundance, the original 2024 horror film hit theaters on May 31 and grossed $2.1 million at the box office in its opening weekend, the second-best opening ever made for IFC Films behind Late night with the devil. For those who weren’t able to see it at Sundance or in theaters, audiences can watch it In a violent nature at home on Shudder later this year.


In a violent nature
is playing in theaters and is expected to be released on Shudder later this year.

Source: Stephen King/X

Teknory